CENTER FOR TEACHING EXCELLENCE

CTE : Teaching and Learning News

Volume 19, Number 1     September & October 2009

Return to Index
Click here for printable version

Beyond the Laboratory Report:
Science Writing in the New Millennium

by Michelle M. Brooks, Department of Chemistry and Biochemistry 


Today’s graduates in the physical sciences must be prepared to communicate their findings to both scientists and laypeople. They must do this over many platforms: scientific journal articles, abstracts written for scientific meetings, internal memos, and over the Internet on wikis, social networking sites, and corporate web pages. How can we, as science educators, address all of these needs in laboratory-based courses? The traditional laboratory course has students perform experiments, analyze data, and report results, usually in the form of a laboratory report sheet. Upper level labs will usually have students write long, formal laboratory reports in the format associated with professional journal articles. While both of these approaches do improve student learning, it is not clear whether they prepare students adequately for the challenges they meet after graduation. In Bioanalytical Chemistry Laboratory (CHEM277) we teach writing by focusing on the development of a broad range of communication skills that include both professional and informal writing exercises. We also incorporate new technology into the course to ensure that students are prepared to communicate in the wide spectrum of arenas available to them. The learning objectives of the course still include development of analytical and problem solving skills, but we have coupled to this a series of assignments to directly improve the students’ communication skills.

Professional writing: Upon graduation, students must be able to communicate scientific results and the meaning of those results to a professional audience. In CHEM277, we require students write brief abstracts (200-300 words) for each of the experiments performed. We introduce the students to this style of writing by using a guided exercise. By writing abstracts, the students learn to concisely describe the goals of the experiment, the results from the experiment, and the meaning of those results using professional, scientifically sound language. Our goal is to prepare the students for the formal laboratory reports that are required in their upper

level courses.

Students in CHEM277 also participate in an interdisciplinary course module that requires professional writing in the form of a technical memo. The students synthesize and characterize silver articles, which are then sent to students in BSCI223 for antimicrobial analysis. The CHEM277 students use the results of these tests and the scientific literature available on the environmental effects of silver to make a recommendation as to whether these particles should be used in medical supplies as an antimicrobial/ antibiotic agent. This form of writing differs from that used in professional journals and requires that the students evaluate a large amount of data and then make a recommendation based on these facts. The report must include their data, their recommendation, and the reasons for that recommendation. The students are still writing to a professional audience, but are using a format that differs from the typical laboratory report.


As more and more people become involved with online social networking sites (like Twitter or Facebook) and editable wikis (like Wikipedia), there exist many more opportunities for scientists to make their work accessible to a much larger portion of the population. We need to prepare our students for this global platform.
 

Writing for the layperson: As science increasingly impacts the general public, it is essential that students graduating with a science major know how to describe scientific studies in a simple, straightforward manner, without having to resort to jargon or highly technical language. We address this in the non-majors version of this course (CHEM272), where we require that the students to write to a general audience. The assignment requires that students concisely describe how the experiment is performed, the results obtained, and the meaning of those results to a non-science audience. Because this style of writing requires the use of higher-level cognitive skills,   

the students find it much more difficult than a typical lab. 

Incorporating technology: As more and more people become involved with online social networking sites (like Twitter or Facebook) and editable wikis (like Wikipedia), there exist many more opportunities for scientists to make their work accessible to a much larger portion of the population. We need to prepare our students for this global platform. To this end, we have incorporated both discussion boards and course wikis into CHEM277. The students are required to design a course wiki on one of the six major experimental topics discussed in class; this work is done collaboratively in groups of four and is written for students entering the course rather than the layperson. These wikis include background theory, a description of an experiment performed in class, the analysis and results from that experiment, and a proposed experiment; all of these must be consistent with the chosen topic. This type of writing requires that the students understand the theory and present it in a clear, organized manner. We take this writing a step further, by having the groups do a 20-minute presentation on the experiment described on the wiki.

Students in the course also utilize discussion boards as part of the nanoparticle project described above. The discussion boards are used to post articles from the primary literature that focus on either the antimicrobial effects of nanoparticles or the effect on the environment of these particles. Students are asked to post one article each and to critically evaluate two others. This form of writing is extremely informal, but it mimics the type of reviews that are expected upon graduation.

In order to prepare our students for the challenges they will face upon graduation, we must provide them with a variety of writing exercises as they move through their major’s curriculum. The examples cited above are only a few ways in which we can couple professional and informal writing to technology in order to give our students the tools that they need for success after graduation.

 



Center For Teaching Excellence
University of Maryland
0405 Marie Mount Hall
College Park, MD 20742
(301) 405-9356
cte@umd.edu
http://www.cte.umd.edu


Teaching and Learning News
Spencer Benson, Director
Dave Eubanks,
Assistant Director
Anna Bedford,
Editor